A Maison Enea limited-drop tee on grass — the brand's own product photography
Maison Enea's own drops — limited, made-to-order, never restocked. The demand was real; the product page was the problem.
▸ Case study · Fashion e-commerce · Audit

Maison Enea.

A brand selling out its drops — while the product page quietly argued against the sale.

ClientMaison Enea
EngagementOne-off brand audit
ScopeSite · copy · conversion
DeliveredJune 2026

The client.

Maison Enea is a limited-drop clothing brand run by its two founders, Andre and Ale. Made-to-order, no restocks — when a piece sells out, it moves to the archive and stays there. Nine releases in, six had sold through. A 67% sell-through rate on limited drops is not a demand problem.

The brand itself was already working: disciplined monochrome aesthetic, product copy with an actual voice, and a philosophy page that reads like a person wrote it — because one did.

The problem.

Their single best trust signal — free 30-day returns, return shipping covered — was buried in footer policy pages. Meanwhile the product page said "no returns to this chapter." The exact moment a customer decides whether to trust a made-to-order purchase, the site was contradicting itself.

The size guide existed, but it was hidden inside the product photo gallery where nobody flips far enough to find it. And sold-out archive pages — full of pieces people wanted — captured none of that demand. No email, no waitlist, nothing.

"The demand was never the problem. The page was." — the audit's one-line diagnosis

What I did.

  • A full independent brand audit — positioning, copy, and a page-by-page conversion walkthrough of the store, delivered as a clickable web report, not a PDF that dies in a downloads folder.
  • Named what's working, on the record. The "one piece at a time" positioning, the archive-as-heritage framing, the voice — so the founders know what not to touch.
  • Found the money already on the table. The returns contradiction, the buried size guide, the silent sold-out pages, a naming convention that drifted between releases.
  • Ranked every fix by effort. The whole quick-win list — returns line under the Add to Cart button, size-guide link next to the size selector, email capture on the archive, review app with seed reviews — costs 30 to 60 minutes each. No rebuild, no replatform.

The result.

Delivered June 2026 — the fix list is in the founders' hands, sequenced so the highest-trust fixes land first. Honest framing: this audit is fresh, so there are no after-numbers to show off yet. What the audit established is the before: real demand (six of nine drops sold through), real trust assets (a genuinely generous return policy), and a handful of under-an-hour fixes standing between the two.

This is what a consult looks like at Kayo: I don't hand over a strategy deck and wish you luck. I hand over a ranked list of specific fixes, with the reasoning attached, that you could start on the same afternoon.

"Their best trust signal — free 30-day returns, shipping covered — was buried in the footer while the product page said the opposite. Six of nine releases had sold through. The demand was never the problem; the page was."

— Kaileigh's honest summary

Deliverables.

  • Independent brand audit (clickable web report)
  • Page-by-page conversion walkthrough
  • Ranked quick-win fix list (each fix 30–60 min)
  • Trust-signal repair plan (returns + size guide)
  • Archive email-capture plan
  • Naming-convention cleanup

Want eyes like this on your business?

One audit, a ranked fix list, no strategy-deck fluff. I reply within a day — usually a few hours.